WebApr 29, 2024 · 通常、エディターはまずその原稿が審査に値するかを判断します。この時点で考慮に値しないと判断された論文はそこでReject(掲載拒否)され、審査は終了しま … WebMotivation: Very slow editorial process that could be considered a total failure. It took 6 months to get 2 reviews. Reviews received were incorrect and based on technical errors and obvious bias. The rejection was appealed, and a resubmission requested accepted for consideration - this took another 2.5 months for a response.
2024年1回目の原著論文投稿→Editor kickは回避?|散文|note
WebApr 3, 2024 · April 3, 2024 at 2:14 am. By. The Associated Press. The Associated Press. LONDON (AP) — British passport office workers kicked off a five-week strike on Monday, as the latest group of civil ... WebStarter or Education. Click the Share button in the top-right corner.; Click the member's current permissions . Select Can view to remove their edit access. They can still view and comment on any files and prototypes. Select Can edit to grant them edit access to any files in this project.; Select Remove to remove their access to the project.; Professional, … knitting patterns cable coats
Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev
WebMar 29, 2024 · エディターからのリジェクトメールでこのような一文がありました。 「While your work is well conceived and presented, we feel it is only a lower priority for 〇 … WebMotivation: Overall, I found the Science Advances submission and review process pretty decent. Not the fastest turnaround, and the coauthor permission forms required at the revision stage are cumbersome. However the journal admins were very responsive and helpful when reaching out. 11.6 weeks. 11.6 weeks. WebIf the review process falls into the margin of reject and revision, the editor will also take some time for decision. Good luck! Cite. 4th Jan, 2024. Joseph C Lee. Queensland Health. red diamond clip art